The Wonderlic Does Now not Topic In Predicting QB Efficiency within the NFL


This week used to be “allow’s leak the QB Wonderlic ratings” time within the NFL. So it’s now that I will have to remind you that it doesn’t topic in predicting who will probably be a bust and who won’t. In reality, you’ll be able to make a fantastic argument that understanding the Wonderlic and reacting to it might result in worse selections on the place.

However to easiest reveal, allow’s pass to the real effects. I took all of the compiled mentioned ratings right here for quarterbacks and pulled the ground workforce of QBs indexed and most sensible workforce relating to Wonderlic rating going again to 1978. However, I then restricted it to 1st and 2d spherical choices to account for different scouting elements and take a look at men who have been perceived on the time as beginning possibilities.

Right here have been the blokes within the backside 25 that I may just in finding, all with Wonderlic ratings of twenty-two or decrease:

I indexed the primary four yr stats for the blokes drafted in 2014 or in advance. ANYA+ is an adjusted rating the place one hundred is moderate and a better rating is best.

Listed here are the highest 24 pronounced scorers, with ratings of 32 or upper, amongst first and 2d spherical selections.

The Top Scorers have been drafted on moderate at a greater place (moderate of pick out 14 as opposed to pick out 20). 60% of the Top Scorers went within the Most sensible 10. forty four% of the Low Scorers did. So we’d be expecting that perhaps the Top Scorers might have rather higher numbers in line with that.

However it’s the other. The low scorers began extra video games (forty.nine to 32.five) within the first four years and had higher passing stats (ANYA+ of ninety six as opposed to 87). The low scorers performed in additional video games, with a profitable proportion of fifty.1%, whilst the top scorers have been at forty six.four%. In taking a look over the ones lists, the bust fee used to be two times as top with the second one listing.

I’m running on a bigger piece on scouting and public feedback on quarterback possibilities pre-draft. Something I’ve spotted is that once a quarterback is defined as “sensible” that has a tendency to be a nasty indicator. It’s now not that intelligence is a nasty trait to have for a quarterback, if truth be told, it’s an excellent one. However standardized checking out intelligence will not be identical to sports activities intelligence and processing, and 2d, if that’s the trait that somebody is opting for to spotlight, it can be like damning somebody via praising them for his or her “character.”

Comments are closed.