Pyongyang at the Prairie, Phase three: All in OCPD’s Crime Lab Circle of relatives

Share

Pyongyang at the Prairie, Phase three:
All in OCPD’s Crime Lab Circle of relatives
by way of Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2018

Final yr, at the morning of Dec. 6, 2016, I emailed Oklahoma Town Police Division senior crime lab analyst Elaine Taylor. She’s the federal government forensic professional who used to be assigned to deal with the DNA proof in relation to former OCPD officer Daniel Holtzclaw.


(Click on all thumbnails for complete-measurement)

Taylor could also be the better half’s mother of Det. Rocky Gregory, who co-led the police research of Holtzclaw from the outset. Det. Gregory accumulated and submitted DNA proof pieces to his sweetheart’s mother; their biased and unprofessional behavior relating to DNA proof assortment, checking out and research has come beneath global scrutiny and public complaint from no less than seven scientists and DNA mavens. The familial dating among Taylor and Gregory, which I first mentioned on Dec. five, 2017, used to be now not disclosed to Holtzclaw’s trial safety staff or to the general public defenders on his appellate workforce.

The town’s litigation department head has shrugged off the failure to reveal this key knowledge and brushed aside any exact or perceived warfare of pastime.

I didn’t understand of Taylor and Gregory’s dating once I first reached out to Taylor concerning the Holtzclaw case remaining yr. Right here used to be the whole textual content of my Dec. 6, 2016, e-mail to Taylor (which I additionally despatched to her manager, Campbell Ruddock, in addition to to the OCPD public knowledge officer at Taylor’s request):

I’m a journalist who has investigated the Daniel Holtzclaw case.

Just lately, a TV display referred to as “Justice By way of Any Way” at the TV One community aired a tale at the case.

This can be a transcript excerpt I hope you’ll be able to reply to:

Detective (Kim) Davis: “Once we were given the effects again from his pants, we have been advised that there used to be feminine DNA at the inside his pants, and we knew it wasn’t Jannie’s, so we knew there needed to be any person else…some other sufferer.”

Announcer: “Detective Davis asks each and every of the alleged sufferers to provide her with the apparel they have been dressed in on the time they have been attacked. The objective is to seek out hint proof of any type of sexual come across with Daniel Holtzclaw.”

Detective Davis: “As we stay getting DNA samples from them and we’re coming back from the serology lab ‘no fit,’ ‘no fit’…”

Announcer: “The 12th and ultimate DNA check carried out at the undergarments of a 17- yr-antique woman, the youngest of Holtzclaw’s sufferers, supplies a success.”

Benjamin Crump, Lawyer for Jannie Ligons: “That they had his DNA proof inside of one of the crucial sufferer’s panties.”

Announcer: “The younger lady’s DNA could also be discovered at the uniform Holtzclaw used to be dressed in the night time of the assault.”

Melvin Corridor, Lawyer for Jannie Ligons: “They discovered vaginal DNA subject matter at the inside his trousers and that vaginal DNA matched the DNA of the 17-yr-antique.”

Are you able to please reply to the highlighted costs in purple and inform me if the assertions are actual or fake?

I’m on closing date for a nationally syndicated newspaper column lately in this tale. My closing date is 3pm Japanese. Thanks.

Best possible,
Michelle Malkin

Approximately six hours after Taylor won my e-mail asking her concerning the accuracy of the TV One software’s statements at the Holtzclaw DNA proof, Taylor forwarded my inquiries to any person’s private Gmail cope with.

I found out the message buried in hundreds of pages of miraculously found out emails became over to me in September 2017. The report sell off best came about after the OCPD had first claimed Taylor’s e-mail account used to be deleted upon her retirement in February 2017, after which later unearthed a couple of thousand messages after looking out “the private pc that used to be assigned to Elaine Taylor.”

So, who did Taylor write and why did she use her executive-issued pc to ship this individual my questions — questions that have by no means been replied through Taylor or someone else on the OCPD in additional than a yr?

A Google seek for the cope with in query yields an access for “Rocky Gregory of Meeker OK” on cubib.com, a public on-line knowledge website online.

The Gmail cope with additionally became up hits on Instagram and Pinterest, which determine “Theresa Gregory” because the debts’ proprietor.

Det. Gregory is married to Theresa Gregory, a former OCPD worker who as soon as labored in the similar police division crime lab as her mom, Elaine Taylor.

Welcome to any other OCPD episode of “All within the Circle of relatives.”

Public data display a Theresa Marie Gregory (nee Theresa Marie Taylor), age forty one, living in Shawnee, Oklahoma, with Rocky Lane Gregory, age forty two; Elaine Marie Taylor, age sixty six, and William Bryan Taylor, age sixty eight, also are associated with the similar Shawnee cope with as Rocky and Theresa Gregory.

On Aug. 7, 2017, I filed any other public data request with the OCPD, partially in search of:

“Copies of emails and attachments, and another communications (virtual or differently) that have been exchanged among Ms. Taylor and OCPD Det. Rocky Gregory in regards to the Daniel Holtzclaw case. This request comprises (however isn’t restricted to) emails on which both Ms. Taylor or Det. Gregory (or each) have been cc’d or bcc’d.”

The town’s litigation department head, Richard Smith, knowledgeable me that the pc account of Det. Gregory used to be searched “and there aren’t any files that fulfill your request.”

Smith brought snarkily: “It’s not that i am positive what you imply through another communications.”

“Different communications” may imply, in fact, different way of communications but even so an reliable town e mail account. Public officers on the federal, state and native ranges were recognized to purposely prevent and bypass disclosure regulations by way of the use of mystery aliases and private e-mail addresses.

On Nov. sixteen, 2017, I filed any other public data request in quest of:

“Copies of emails and attachments, and another communications (virtual or in a different way) from any and all debts that have been exchanged among former OCPD forensic analyst Elaine Taylor and previous OCPD worker Theresa Gregory in regards to the Daniel Holtzclaw case. This request comprises (however isn’t restricted to) any emails on which both Ms. Taylor or Ms. Gregory (or each) have been cc’d or bcc’d.”

On Dec. 15, 2017, snarky Richard Smith used to be in fantastic shape as soon as once more, responding:

“Please be instructed that the ‘OCPD’ does now not have any workers and Ms. Gregory left her venture within the OCPD lab in 2012, however is still a Town worker. Her pc used to be looked for any e-mail from October 2013 to February 2017 for any emails to and/or from Elaine Taylor relating to Daniel Holtzclaw and there a (sic) no such emails.

“I accept as true with this satisfies this Open Data Request.”

No, in reality, it doesn’t.

If the town is claiming that no communications among Elaine Taylor and Rocky Gregory or among Elaine Taylor and Theresa Gregory in regards to the Holtzclaw case exist, then to whom precisely did Elaine Taylor ahead my Holtzclaw case DNA proof questions?

Allow’s go back to my DNA questions for a second — those that Taylor forwarded to the thriller e mail cope with. In my e-mail, I confirmed Taylor and her crime lab manager, Campbell Ruddock, that the TV One unique had broadcast fake details about the DNA proof:

Announcer: “The 12th and ultimate DNA check carried out at the undergarments of a 17- yr-antique woman, the youngest of Holtzclaw’s sufferers, supplies a success.”

Benjamin Crump, Lawyer for Jannie Ligons: “That they had his DNA proof inside of probably the most sufferer’s panties.”

Announcer: “The younger lady’s DNA could also be discovered at the uniform Holtzclaw used to be dressed in the night time of the assault.”

Melvin Corridor, Lawyer for Jannie Ligons: “They discovered vaginal DNA subject matter at the inside his trousers and that vaginal DNA matched the DNA of the 17-yr-antique.”

The reality? None of Holtzclaw’s DNA used to be discovered on any of the thirteen accusers or in any in their apparel.

There aren’t any crime lab data, bench notes or police stories in any of the case fabrics and transcripts I’ve reviewed that experience ever claimed that Holtzclaw’s DNA proof used to be discovered “inside of one of the crucial sufferer’s panties.”

There aren’t any crime lab data, bench notes or police reviews in any of the case fabrics and transcripts I’ve reviewed that experience ever claimed that “vaginal DNA subject matter at the inside his trousers and that vaginal DNA matched the DNA of the 17-yr-antique.”

In reality, because the crime lab’s personal data display, the so-referred to as smoking gun DNA proof related to the 17-yr-antique accuser used to be present in minuscule combinations of what Elaine Taylor defined as epithelial pores and skin cell phone DNA on Holtzclaw’s pants, which incorporated each feminine and unknown male DNA. The DNA from the fly of the uniform pants derived from no less than 3 folks. All 4 DNA samples taken by way of Taylor from Holtzclaw’s pants incorporated DNA from no less than one male. The pants were positioned in a paper bag treated via Det. Gregory together with his naked palms.

No proof of vaginal fluid used to be noticed at the pants, as Taylor herself testified at trial. She said that she noticed not anything suspicious — no visual stains or deposits — at the fly of the pants the use of an overly brilliant gentle and a magnifying glass. She didn’t check the uniform pants for frame fluids or view them with an alternative gentle supply that reasons frame fluids, together with vaginal fluid, to fluoresce.

In spite of failing to determine the presence of vaginal fluid thru serological checks or via the use of an alternative gentle supply, Taylor recklessly testified out of doors the limits of technology that it used to be a “excellent risk” that DNA matching the 17-yr-antique’s profile used to be more likely to have transferred in vaginal fluid. Assistant District Lawyer Gayland Gieger then falsely informed the jury in his final observation that it used to be a “reality” that DNA from the partitions of the teenager’s vagina transferred in vaginal fluids — although it’s incorrect to claim the presence of a substance that has now not been examined.

How can the nationally accepted OCPD crime lab permit such obtrusive forensic falsehoods — claimed via accuser Jannie Ligons’ legal professionals Benjamin Crump and Melvin Corridor, through the TV One documentary staff and host, and through ADA Gayland Gieger and Elaine Taylor herself — to be unfold concerning the DNA proof within the Holtzclaw case?

Based on my July 31, 2017 public data request for “(a)ll communications (digital, written, faxed, textual content messages, or in a different way) through the Oklahoma Town Police Division in regards to the software referred to as ‘Justice By way of Any Approach’ at the TV One community concerning the Daniel Holtzclaw case, which initially aired in October 2016,” town lawyer Richard Smith blew me off. He informed my Oklahoma open data attorney, Josh Lee, that “on the time of this request, the previous OCPD Public Knowledge Officer (PIO) were promoted and the brand new PIO does now not keep in mind ever seeing this request.”

(Word: E-mail/fax notifications have been despatched on my behalf to the OCPD by means of the Muckrock.com public data website online on Aug. 15, Aug. 30, Sept. 14, Sept. 29, Oct. sixteen, Oct. 31, Nov. 15, Nov. 30 and Dec. 15, 2017.)

Smith then argued: “In line with this request, please be prompt that Ms. Malkin’s request is obscure, unreasonable, and so on.”

And, he introduced: “In any adventure, please recommend your consumer that the OCPD didn’t reply to this system.”

That reaction is nonresponsive, evasive and petulant. How boastful to justify a public data denial with a flippant “and so forth.” My request used to be particular and completely affordable. Nor did I prohibit my open data seek to communications that took place after this system aired, as Mr. Smith smugly tried to redefine my request.

I consider the general public merits to understand who on the Oklahoma Town Police Division communicated with the TV One team of workers approximately DNA proof that used to be grossly and recklessly misrepresented at the software.

I consider the general public merits to understand why the OCPD has did not right kind brazen real inaccuracies disseminated concerning the Holtzclaw DNA proof.

What used to be Taylor’s function in sharing my DNA-similar questions with the landlord of the private Gmail account?

Used to be Taylor’s manager, Campbell Ruddock, mindful that Taylor used her executive account to ahead my DNA-similar inquiries to an individual gmail account associated together with her daughter and son-in-regulation detective?

What number of different undisclosed emails to and/or from Elaine Taylor approximately Holtzclaw DNA proof were suppressed through the crime lab and town?

And what different e-mail aliases and private bills were utilized by OCPD body of workers or different town officers to subvert public disclosure now not most effective in Holtzclaw’s instances, however different instances as smartly?

Michelle Malkin is host of “Michelle Malkin Investigates” on CRTV.com. Her e-mail cope with is writemalkin@gmail.com. To determine extra approximately Michelle Malkin and skim options by way of different Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, discuss with the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2018 CREATORS.COM

***

Pyongyang at the Prairie, Phase One

Pyongyang at the Prairie, Phase

***

Watch:

Published in: Daniel Holtzclaw

Comments are closed.